The Ripple Effects of Bank Closure and Acquisitions

Small Fish in a Big Pond

I am in the kitchen preparing my brand-new batch of homemade ginger drink while listening to podcasts that are raising some serious concerns about the state of the financial system. The news of Silicon Valley Bank closure by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, and the rumored acquisition of Credit Suisse by UBS, are two recent developments that have caught my attention. As I ponder on the implications of these events, I can´t help but think about the possible risks and consequences for the financial industry and society as a whole. In this blog post, I’ll explore these topics and more, and hopefully provide some insights and perspectives on the current state of the financial system.


Silicon Valley Bank Closure and Its Implications

Silicon Valley Bank, a leading tech-focused bank based in California, was shut down in March 2023 by the state’s financial regulator, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. According to the regulator, the bank had engaged in unsafe and unsound practices that threatened its safety and soundness, and the integrity of the financial system. The closure of the bank, which serves many startups and venture capital firms in the tech industry, has raised concerns about the potential ripple effects on the startup ecosystem and the broader economy.

The closure of Silicon Valley Bank also highlights the importance of effective regulatory oversight and risk management in the financial system. While innovation and disruption are important drivers of growth and progress, they can also lead to new risks and challenges that require careful attention and mitigation. As we see more tech companies entering the financial services space, it’s important that we maintain a balance between innovation and regulation, and ensure that the risks are properly assessed and managed.


UBS in Talks to Acquire Credit Suisse: What It Means

Another major development in the financial industry is the reported acquisition talks between UBS and Credit Suisse. If the deal goes through, it would create one of the largest banks in Europe, and potentially have significant implications for the global financial system. While the deal is still in the early stages and there’s no guarantee that it will be completed, the rumors have already triggered reactions from investors, analysts, and regulators.

On one hand, the potential merger could lead to cost savings and synergies for the two banks, and create a stronger competitor to other global banks. On the other hand, the concentration of assets and market power could increase the systemic risk and create challenges for smaller players in the industry. Moreover, the deal could face regulatory hurdles and public scrutiny, especially in light of the recent controversies and scandals that have plagued the banking industry.


Systemic Risk and the Smaller Financial Institutions

The issue of systemic risk is a perennial concern in the financial industry, especially after the system banking crash of 2005. While the measures put in place after the crisis have helped to strengthen the resilience and stability of the system, there are still challenges and gaps that need to be addressed. One of these challenges is the role of smaller financial institutions that provide niche products and services to specific communities and industries.

While the larger banks and financial institutions are subject to stricter regulations and oversight, the smaller players often operate under a different set of rules and standards. This could create asymmetries in risk-taking and risk-management, and increase the likelihood of contagion and spillover effects. Therefore, it’s important that we pay attention to the risks and vulnerabilities of the smaller players, and ensure that they are not overlooked or underestimated.


Inflation and Central Bank Decisions: Impact on Investment Portfolios

Another key factor that is contributing to the uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets is inflation. Inflation refers to the general increase in the prices of goods and services over time, and is typically measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or other similar indicators. Inflation can be driven by a variety of factors, including changes in supply and demand, changes in government policies, and changes in the overall level of economic activity.

In recent months, there has been growing concern about inflation, as the global economy recovers from the pandemic and demand for goods and services increases. This has led to rising prices for a range of products, from food and energy to housing and healthcare. The Federal Reserve and other central banks have signaled that they are closely monitoring these developments, and may take action to address inflation if necessary.

One common tool that central banks use to address inflation is to increase interest rates. When interest rates are higher, it becomes more expensive for businesses and individuals to borrow money, which can help to reduce demand for goods and services and slow down inflation. However, raising interest rates can also have negative effects on the financial markets, especially for smaller financial institutions and investors.

For example, when interest rates rise, the value of bonds and other fixed-income securities typically declines. This can lead to losses for investors who hold these securities in their portfolios. Moreover, smaller financial institutions may have a higher exposure to interest rate risk, as they may not have the same resources and expertise as larger institutions to manage these risks effectively


Similarities and Differences with the 2008 Crisis

The system banking crash of 2008, was a major event that shook the global financial system and the economy. The crisis was triggered by a combination of factors, including subprime lending, securitization, and risk-taking by banks and other financial institutions. The collapse of Lehman Brothers, one of the largest investment banks in the world, marked the beginning of the crisis and led to a domino effect that spread across the world.

While the causes and consequences of the 2008 crisis were complex and multifaceted, there are some similarities and differences with the current situation. One similarity is the role of regulation and oversight in preventing and mitigating risks. The measures put in place after the 2008 crisis, such as the Dodd-Frank Act in the US and the Basel III framework globally, have helped to improve the resilience and stability of the financial system. However, there are still concerns about the adequacy and effectiveness of these measures, especially in light of the evolving risks and challenges in the industry.

Another similarity is the interconnectedness and complexity of the financial system. The interdependence of banks, financial markets, and other institutions means that risks can spread quickly and unpredictably, and create feedback loops that amplify the effects of shocks. Moreover, the increasing use of technology and digital platforms in the financial industry has created new risks and vulnerabilities that require new approaches and solutions.


One major difference between the 2008 crisis and the current situation is the role of smaller financial institutions. While the 2008 crisis was largely driven by the failures and excesses of the largest banks and investment firms, the current situation involves a more diverse and fragmented landscape of financial institutions. The closure of Silicon Valley Bank, for example, is a reminder that even innovative and tech-focused banks can be vulnerable to risks and challenges.


The Criticality of the 18th March 2023 Weekend

Finally, this 18th March 2023 weekend has been deemed by some experts as a potentially critical moment for the financial system. It is worth noting that regulatory authorities typically conduct their assessments and take actions such as bank closures over the weekend, when markets are closed and disruptions can be more effectively managed. As such, this weekend could see regulators taking action that could further disrupt the financial system.

Moreover, as previously mentioned, UBS is in talks to acquire Credit Suisse, and the result of these talks could also be announced over the weekend. If these talks fall through, it could have a significant impact on the financial system and further exacerbate the already heightened levels of uncertainty and volatility in the markets.

Given the potential for significant events to occur during this weekend, it’s crucial that financial institutions, regulators, and investors remain vigilant and prepared. The risks and challenges that the financial system faces are complex and multifaceted, and require a comprehensive and coordinated response. This could involve better regulation and supervision of financial institutions, improved risk management practices, and the development of new tools and technologies to detect and mitigate systemic risks.

The weekend of St. Patrick’s Day and other celebrations may seem like a time for relaxation and enjoyment, but it could also mark the beginning of a new crisis in the financial system. As such, it’s critical that we stay alert and focused on addressing the challenges and risks that lie ahead.



In this blog post, we’ve explored some of the recent developments and trends in the financial industry, and discussed their implications for the system as a whole. From the closure of Silicon Valley Bank to the potential acquisition of Credit Suisse by UBS, we’ve seen how the industry is evolving and facing new risks and challenges. However, we’ve also seen how

  • regulation,
  • oversight, and
  • innovation

can help to mitigate these risks and ensure a more stable and sustainable financial system. As we move forward, it’s important that we continue to learn from the past, adapt to the present, and prepare for the future.

Latest Insights

Post Info

Join our insiders list

Shopping Basket